UX: Make podiums and leaderboards feel exciting #19

Closed
opened 2026-04-04 05:34:40 +00:00 by Brouie · 4 comments
Brouie commented 2026-04-04 05:34:40 +00:00 (Migrated from gitlab.com)

podiums and leaderboards are currently plain data tables. need visual treatment -- ranking badges, highlight for top positions, your-rank indicator. this is a game, winners should feel rewarded visually.

podiums and leaderboards are currently plain data tables. need visual treatment -- ranking badges, highlight for top positions, your-rank indicator. this is a game, winners should feel rewarded visually.
Brouie commented 2026-04-06 06:51:58 +00:00 (Migrated from gitlab.com)

reviewed on 254999d. podiums and leaderboards are plain numbered lists: '1. 0x3C44CdDd... -- 250 BP'. no visual hierarchy between 1st/2nd/3rd. no trophy icons, no color differentiation, no highlight for the connected wallet. the 'Podium Pool (live)' section shows decimal+abbr payout amounts but they're just text rows. for a competitive game, winners need visual celebration -- gold/silver/bronze treatment, your-rank callout, maybe animated transitions when positions change. screenshot attached.

reviewed on 254999d. podiums and leaderboards are plain numbered lists: '1. 0x3C44CdDd... -- 250 BP'. no visual hierarchy between 1st/2nd/3rd. no trophy icons, no color differentiation, no highlight for the connected wallet. the 'Podium Pool (live)' section shows decimal+abbr payout amounts but they're just text rows. for a competitive game, winners need visual celebration -- gold/silver/bronze treatment, your-rank callout, maybe animated transitions when positions change. screenshot attached.
Brouie commented 2026-04-06 07:08:47 +00:00 (Migrated from gitlab.com)

image.png{width=460 height=600}

![image.png](/uploads/1a8c1067de58c474cdcaae8f5eef9ef4/image.png){width=460 height=600}
PlasticDigits commented 2026-04-09 04:53:07 +00:00 (Migrated from gitlab.com)

qa dev @brouie local frontend verification passed for this issue in commit c23f7d9. Please verify that the fix is in place and add any additional recommendations shortly.

qa dev @brouie local frontend verification passed for this issue in commit c23f7d9. Please verify that the fix is in place and add any additional recommendations shortly.
Brouie commented 2026-04-09 06:36:32 +00:00 (Migrated from gitlab.com)

Verified on 4e4ec94 with local Anvil stack (live data). Fix is in place. Layout, section hierarchy, and content all match the issue requirements. One note: podium still shows 3 categories (50/25/25) but per spec review (ecosystem-qa #4) it should be 4 categories (30/30/20/20 including WarBow). This is a separate spec vs implementation gap, not a regression from this UX pass.

Verified on 4e4ec94 with local Anvil stack (live data). Fix is in place. Layout, section hierarchy, and content all match the issue requirements. One note: podium still shows 3 categories (50/25/25) but per spec review (ecosystem-qa #4) it should be 4 categories (30/30/20/20 including WarBow). This is a separate spec vs implementation gap, not a regression from this UX pass.
Brouie (Migrated from gitlab.com) closed this issue 2026-04-09 06:39:24 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference
code/yieldomega#19
No description provided.