Docs and verify-issue-365 for registry outage observability (#375) #892
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
agent:fix_bugfix
agent:fix_conflicts
agent:fix_security
agent:gap_analysis
agent:implement
agent:implement
agent:implement
agent:open_issues
agent:ready
agent:research
agent:security_audit
agent:verify
architecture
backend
blocker:hybrid
blocker:launch
blocker:limit-orders
blocker:v2
block:log_only
block:security
bug
ci
contracts
correctness
deploy
dev
devops
docs
documentation
duplicate
e2e
enhancement
epic
feature
frontend
functional-completion
gas
good first issue
governance
help wanted
high-risk
hooks
hybrid
indexer
infra
infrastructure
integrators
invalid
launch-blocker
limit-orders
localnet
localterra
low priority
missing-implementation
needs-design
ops
performance
priority
high
priority
medium
product
qa
QA
question
ready
ready
research
scripts
security
security-hardening
smartcontracts
tech-debt
testing
ux
UX
v2
verification
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
code/cl8y-dex-terraclassic!892
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "docs/verify-issue-365-registry-outage"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Summary
Completes GitLab #375 (child of #365): integrator-facing documentation for distinguishing unregistered traders from registry LCD outage, plus a one-command regression ladder for re-verifying #365 observability after merges.
docs/integrators.md— new § Fee-discount registry outage: on-chain fail-closed P5 semantics, off-chain signals (GET /api/v1/health/fee-discount, LCD queries), decision table, cross-links (no duplicate tier table).scripts/qa/verify-issue-365.sh+make verify-issue-365— Postgres-only ladder: contractswap_uses_full_fee_when_discount_registry_query_fails, indexerapi_fee_discount_health, frontendfeeDiscountRegistryWarningunit tests.skills/AGENTS_FEE_DISCOUNT_TIERS.md,docs/testing.mdreference the new section and verify target.Acceptance checklist
docs/integrators.mdregistry-outage guidance with health + on-chain linksmake verify-issue-365exists and passesmake verify-issue-365docs/testing.mdor skills doc references verify targetverify-issue-365in bothVerification checklist (third parties)
git checkout docs/verify-issue-365-registry-outage && make verify-issue-365— expect 3 PASS, exit 0.docs/integrators.md#fee-discount-registry-outage— actionable without reading Rust sources.make check-fee-discount-tier-docs— tier table unchanged (I10 link only).Test plan
Related: #365 (parent), #373 (indexer health), #374 (frontend warning).
changed the description
changed the description
Security review
Commit reviewed:
b92a12ced36a5b803b78fa13637005d9f017968cScope: 7 files — integrator/audit/tier docs (
docs/integrators.mdregistry-outage section, cross-links),scripts/qa/verify-issue-365.sh,make verify-issue-365inMakefile, skills/testing references. No changes to CosmWasm contracts, indexer runtime handlers, frontend production paths, or dependencies.Method: Full MR diff review; traced attacker-controlled input to sinks in modified code; compared
verify-issue-365.shto existingverify-issue-369.shbootstrap pattern. Prior MR security-review threads: none.Outcome:
FINDINGS: 0medium+Summary
This MR is documentation and developer QA automation only. The new verify script uses
set -euo pipefail, hardcodedcargo test/npm run test:runinvocations (no user/CI parameters interpolated into shell), and optionalmake setup-indexer-postgresbootstrap — same trusted-local pattern as otherverify-issue-*ladders. The integrator doc section describes existing P5/I10 fail-closed on-chain behavior and public health-endpoint fields; it does not expose secrets and includes guidance not to publish per-trader registry errors on public APIs.No injection, authz bypass, SSRF, XSS, path traversal, secret leakage, or supply-chain changes were introduced in this diff.
Inline threads: none (no medium+ findings).
mentioned in commit
edbe288781