[Epic] Security hardening & correctness reviews #60

Closed
opened 2026-04-09 03:23:35 +00:00 by PlasticDigits · 4 comments
PlasticDigits commented 2026-04-09 03:23:35 +00:00 (Migrated from gitlab.com)

Summary

Security posture and integrator-risk documentation — not primary feature delivery.

Evidence

  • docs/reviews/20260409T030009Z/SECURITY_REVIEW.md
  • Invariant L7 docs/contracts-security-audit.md

Dependencies

Some items need product intent from Epic 1.

Acceptance criteria

  • Child doc/review issues completed
## Summary Security posture and integrator-risk documentation — **not** primary feature delivery. ## Evidence - `docs/reviews/20260409T030009Z/SECURITY_REVIEW.md` - Invariant **L7** `docs/contracts-security-audit.md` ## Dependencies Some items need product intent from Epic 1. ## Acceptance criteria - [ ] Child doc/review issues completed
PlasticDigits commented 2026-04-09 03:24:14 +00:00 (Migrated from gitlab.com)

mentioned in issue #80

mentioned in issue #80
PlasticDigits commented 2026-04-09 03:24:14 +00:00 (Migrated from gitlab.com)

marked this issue as related to #80

marked this issue as related to #80
PlasticDigits commented 2026-04-09 03:24:17 +00:00 (Migrated from gitlab.com)

mentioned in issue #81

mentioned in issue #81
PlasticDigits commented 2026-04-09 03:24:17 +00:00 (Migrated from gitlab.com)

marked this issue as related to #81

marked this issue as related to #81
PlasticDigits (Migrated from gitlab.com) closed this issue 2026-04-20 12:04:05 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
code/cl8y-dex-terraclassic#60
No description provided.